High vs Low AI-Exposure Worker Characteristics

Data

Per massenkoff-mccrory-labor-market-impacts-2026 Figure 5. US Current Population Survey, Aug–Oct 2022 (immediately before ChatGPT release).

Comparison groups: Top quartile of observed-exposure workers (N=32,301) vs zero-exposure workers (N=42,546).

DimensionNo exposureTop quartileDifference
AI coverage %0.0%38.8%+38.8 pp
Demographics
Age (years)41.042.9+1.9
Female38.8%54.4%+15.5 pp
Hispanic24.8%13.8%−11.0 pp
White, non-Hispanic54.5%65.1%+10.6 pp
Black, non-Hispanic13.2%9.7%−3.5 pp
Asian, non-Hispanic4.7%9.1%+4.4 pp
Married44.6%54.9%+10.4 pp
Education
Less than HS13.2%2.3%−10.9 pp
HS diploma38.9%17.7%−21.2 pp
Some college / assoc.30.0%25.5%−4.6 pp
Bachelor’s13.3%37.1%+23.8 pp
Graduate degree4.5%17.4%+12.8 pp
Labor market
Hours / week37.538.7+1.2
Hourly wage ($)$22.23$32.69+$10.45 (+47%)
Union member11.7%5.3%−6.4 pp
Observations42,54632,301—

Key asymmetries

  1. Graduate degree share is ~4× larger in exposed cohort (17.4% vs 4.5%).
  2. Bachelor’s share nearly triples (37.1% vs 13.3%).
  3. 47% wage premium for exposed work.
  4. Halving of union membership (5.3% vs 11.7%) — exposed work is overwhelmingly non-unionised white-collar work.
  5. 15.5 pp more female — but conditional on the education profile, not the prior-bear-case “low-education clerical women” framing.
  6. 11 pp less Hispanic — exposure is concentrated in non-Hispanic-white and Asian cohorts.

See

Citation

Figure 5, Massenkoff & McCrory (2026), p. 9. CPS Aug–Oct 2022. Top-quartile defined by employment-weighted occupation-level exposure score.